Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
- X-seq: zsh-users 341
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: luomat@xxxxxxxx, zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 1996 23:54:58 -0700
- In-reply-to: "Timothy J. Luoma" <luomat@xxxxxxxx> "zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2" (Aug 4, 9:12pm)
- References: <199608050112.VAA22841@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Aug 4, 9:12pm, Timothy J. Luoma wrote:
} Subject: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
}
} This newest version of the Z-shell is very slow.... How slow? I
} can see each character as the cursor draws the PROMPT and as it
} redraws old history lines (up arrow).
}
} Is anyone else noticing this on their OS?
I'm not, on Linux, but I've only been using pre6 since a few minutes ago.
Did you compile with debugging and zsh_mem and so forth? To what previous
version are you comparing it (so we know what changes to re-examine)?
The only recent change that would have any conceivable effect on this is
that all references to the variable `columns' in display update code have
been replaced by the ternary expression `(columns < 1 ? 80 : columns)'.
But your compiler would have to be doing something really awful for that
to have any noticable effect.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
New male in /home/schaefer:
>N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author