Re: zsh 3.0.2 useless on NeXTStation? (Solved)

[Wolfgang Hukriede <whukriede@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear zsh-workers!

Turns out, stdout (aka shout) was totally unbuffered, no wonder, it was
too slow. Buffering should be beneficial to other systems also.

Many thanks, and special greetings to Timothy!

Wolfgang.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, here's the patch:

*** init.c.old  Tue Dec 17 21:14:11 1996
--- init.c      Thu Dec 19 00:53:37 1996
***************
*** 376,378 ****
  #ifdef _IOFBF
!     setvbuf(shout, NULL, _IOFBF, 0);
  #endif
--- 376,378 ----
  #ifdef _IOFBF
!     setvbuf(shout, NULL, _IOFBF, BUFSIZ);
  #endif

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996 22:55:50 +0100,
Wolfgang Hukriede <whukriede@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 96 21:04:42 -0500 Timothy J Luoma <luomat@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Zsh version 3.0.2 has been released!
>
> > It is still too slow to be usable on my NeXTStation, specifically
> > the redrawing of the prompts.
> >
> > I'm at a loss as to what to do.  I'd really like to use 3.0.2, I'm
> > still on 2.6.  Is anyone else using 3.0.2 on a non-turbo
> > NeXTstation?  Are you experiencing any troubles such as the ones I
> > mentioned?   I'm also seeing weird things when I use the up arrow to
> > go through history.
>
> Dear zsh-workers!
>
> I've to confirm this. I just downloaded and compiled zsh-3.0.2 on NextStep
> 3.2 (Blackbox). The symptoms are as Timothy describes them. Setting BAUD to
> zero does help only very little. Yes, the behaviour was much better with zsh
> 2.5.2. (More plainly, 2.5.2 was right, 3.0.2 isn't.)
>
> The symptoms look as if there now are too many flushes in the zsh terminal
> output code. Since on the Next all screen output is done via
> Display-Postscript, which does heavy buffering on its own, I'd urgently
> suspect the problems are caused by interference of the buffering mechanisms.
>