Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh in shell-mode
- X-seq: zsh-users 595
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Pekka Marjola <pema@xxxxxx>, acs@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh in shell-mode
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:36:07 -0800
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Pekka Marjola <pema@xxxxxx> "Re: zsh in shell-mode" (Jan 9, 1:13pm)
- References: <199701090417.XAA28719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <970108220902.ZM8065@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <k9wloa3f6e2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: schaefer@xxxxxxx
On Jan 9, 1:13pm, Pekka Marjola wrote:
} Subject: Re: zsh in shell-mode
}
} } Or do people use M-x term?
}
} Bart> I've never really tried it. I did just now, for a couple of minutes,
} Bart> and was not impressed.
}
} In fact, zsh works reasonably well in term-char-mode. That way I get
} zsh's completions and zle. (Set TERM to vt100 :)
Ah, yes, it's *much* better with TERM=vt100 rather than TERM=eterm.
(Why is that?)
I may actually try using it that way today for a bit.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author