Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Chronology (was Re: %B%~%b bug in $PROMPT in 3.1.5 ?)

X-seq: zsh-users 2012
From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Chronology (was Re: %B%~%b bug in $PROMPT in 3.1.5 ?)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 09:55:40 -0800
In-reply-to: <vbg19p63lo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <199901051255.HAA03909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <990105085256.ZM9619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vbg19p63lo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 5,  5:17pm, Bruce Stephens wrote:
} Subject: Re: Chronology (was Re: %B%~%b bug in $PROMPT in 3.1.5 ?)
}
} Presumably csh incompatibility isn't such an issue nowadays?

The issue was never csh (in)compatibility.  It was, and continues to be,
functional compatibility with preceding versions of zsh itself.

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com

References:
- Chronology (was Re: %B%~%b bug in $PROMPT in 3.1.5 ?)
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Chronology (was Re: %B%~%b bug in $PROMPT in 3.1.5 ?)
  - From: Bruce Stephens

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author