Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Call for opinions on a couple of prospective zsh patches
- X-seq: zsh-users 2364
- From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+lists/zsh/users/news/@tequila.cs.yale.edu>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Call for opinions on a couple of prospective zsh patches
- Date: 06 Jun 1999 14:41:37 -0400
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <990606065150.ZM9165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5lr9np8e8e.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19990606181357.A25812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <990606172526.ZM10382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: monnier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "Bart" == Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We've got separate people maintaining the two releases now, so there's
> little conflict in keeping both updated.
I simply have the impression that there hasn't been (m)any complaints
about 3.0.x stability, so why keep hacking on it instead of getting 3.2
ready for wider distribution ?
The 3.0.x line should be restricted to bug-fixes. Just like 3.2.x will be.
> One concern is to get out a Y2K-fixed 3.0 to be included in various linux
> releases etc. before 3.2 reaches fruition.
I don't see in what way dabbrev, LS_COLORS and `mixed case partial word
motions' will help fix the Y2K bug.
Stefan
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author