Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: different kind of glob_complete?

X-seq: zsh-users 2568
From: Will Day <willday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh users mailing list <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: different kind of glob_complete?
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:28:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <199909030741.JAA03749@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from Sven Wischnowsky on Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:41:37AM +0200
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <199909030741.JAA03749@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Will Day <willday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

A short time ago, at a computer terminal far, far away, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
>And, of course for the new completion system it's already there, just
>use the `_match' completer with a configuration of `match_original=only'
>or `match_original=yes'.
>
>So, yes, the code in tricky.c can do this now (this was added in
>5871), but I didn't change the behavior of compctl-style completion.
>We could add an option to allow this for it, but should we? Or may
>this be an incentive to go to the new completion system?

I haven't been keeping up with the discussion about the new completion, so
I'm not familiar with how it works differently.  Perhaps, indeed, this is a
good incentive for me to check it out.  As an intro example, how would I go
about configuring the behavior I was looking for?

-- 
Will Day     <PGP mail preferred>     OIT / O&E / Technical Support
willday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx            Georgia Tech, Atlanta 30332-0715
  -> Opinions expressed are mine alone and do not reflect OIT policy <-
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
    Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania Assembly, Nov. 11, 1755

Attachment: pgpeqV3Spsklf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: different kind of glob_complete?
  - From: Sven Wischnowsky

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author