Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: newbie's question about completion
- X-seq: zsh-users 4461
- From: "Nadav Har'El" <nyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Dan Kenigsberg <danken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: newbie's question about completion
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:06:06 +0200
- Cc: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Hebrew-date: 22 Heshvan 5762
- In-reply-to: <200111081144.NAA16941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from danken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:44:11PM +0200
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <3BEA6619.567EA058@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200111081144.NAA16941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about "Re: newbie's question about completion":
> > Try: unsetopt recexact
>
> Thanks Will and Oliver. That's exactly the answer to my anguish.
Strange, I don't remember recexact being set by default on any version of
zsh... Is it perhaps the doing of your Linux distribution, in some file
like /etc/z*, /etc/profile.d/*, or something?
I've been sending bug reports to Redhat on almost every one of their
releases asking them to remove weird settings that they put in files like
/etc/zshrc which override's Zsh's standard defaults and confuse people
who read the manual. In Redhat 7.2, for example, they put "bindkey -e" in
/etc/zshrc. This is useless because emacs mode is the default mode anyway -
but ruins the vi default for people who set VISUAL=vi (as explained in
the zsh manual). After I reported this "bug", they said they'll remove this
setting in the next release.
--
Nadav Har'El | Thursday, Nov 8 2001, 22 Heshvan 5762
nyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |-----------------------------------------
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |From the Linux getopt(3) manpage: "BUGS:
http://nadav.harel.org.il |This manpage is confusing."
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author