Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: replacing completion
- X-seq: zsh-users 4969
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: replacing completion
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 09:47:33 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1020508162357.ZM7949@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20020508090045.G13119@xxxxxxxx> <1020508155324.ZM7867@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020508110051.P13119@xxxxxxxx> <1020508162357.ZM7949@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On May 8, 11:00am, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> } Subject: Re: replacing completion
> }
> } On Wed, 08 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> } > compctl -k hosts -x 's[foo]' -k '(user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)' -U -- ssh
> }
> } Didn't work.
>
> Hmm, it works in 3.0.x. Looks like a bug has been introduced into
> `compctl -U' at some point in the 4.0 series.
Sorry for the delay.
It irritates me that it works in 3.0.x. Because, as the docs say, a
`s[...]' string is meant to be left alone. A `S[...]' string can be
changed by the completion code and with
compctl -k hosts -x 'S[foo]' -k '(user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)' -U -- ssh
it works for me.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author