Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: history expansion
- X-seq: zsh-users 5393
- From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh users <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: history expansion
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:32:37 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1020926170547.ZM1625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh users <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20020925103319.GC30361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020925234333.ZM6021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020926101224.GA30361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20465.1033036099@xxxxxxx> <1020926170547.ZM1625@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
# schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2002-09-26 17:05:47 +0000:
> In particular I'm concerned about the default (non-CSH_JUNKIE) history
> behavior:
>
> By default, a history reference with no event designator refers to the
> same event as any preceding history reference on that command line; if
> it is the only history reference in a command, it refers to the previous
> command.
>
> Within a nested expression, which references "precede" which others? If yet
> another history reference follows (in a separate word) a nested reference,
> which of the subexpressions of the nested reference determines which event
> is used by that second reference?
Being a csh history junkie, this is not for me to decide. :)
> (If this thread continues, it should be moved to zsh-workers.)
Thanks for considering it!
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
7:27PM up 9 days, 2:42, 11 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00
end
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author