Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: why does "jobs | wc" not work?
- X-seq: zsh-users 5525
- From: Dominik Vogt <dominik.vogt@xxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: why does "jobs | wc" not work?
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:42:22 +0100
- In-reply-to: <18744.1038308955@xxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20021126104930.GE1937@xxxxxx> <18744.1038308955@xxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: dominik.vogt@xxxxxx
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:09:15AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There seems to be a strange bug with the jobs command in
> > zsh-4.0.4. It seems that the output of the jobs command refuses
> > to go into a pipe.
>
> This isn't strictly a bug, but there's a workaround in the 4.1 code.
>
> In zsh
>
> jobs | anything
>
> causes the shell to fork for the left hand side of the pipeline.
Um, why must builtin commands run in a subshell? I would have
naively thought commands like "echo something | ..." would just
run in the current shell. Spawning a subshell sounds a bit
inefficient.
> This
> is then no longer the shell with the job control, hence doesn't show any
> jobs. Other shells fork the `anything' and run `jobs' in the current
> shell. We deliberately don't do that because we like to be able to do
>
> anything | read foo
>
> to get the variable $foo set in the current shell (and all sorts of similar
> examples).
>
> In 4.1, we use the obvious workaround: remember that we're in a subshell
> of an interactive shell and keep a fossilized list of the jobs.
Obvious, maybe, but it still sounds wrong in my ears.
> This can
> mean that the task list isn't up to date at the point where the jobs
> command is actually run --- though there are obvious races when
> background jobs terminate anyway, so I don't think that's a major
> concern.
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author