Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: aliases not getting expanded inside functions?
- X-seq: zsh-users 5650
- From: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: aliases not getting expanded inside functions?
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 06:29:38 -0200
- In-reply-to: <20030103185407.GA11836@xxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <15893.44217.393956.262362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030103164552.A28966@xxxxxxxxxxx> <15893.50996.646711.184945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030103184455.A5692@xxxxxxxxxxx> <15893.53780.524763.695176@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030103185407.GA11836@xxxxxxxx>
Zefram (zefram@xxxxxxxx) wrote on 3 January 2003 18:54:
>That's the "p" (*small* p) flag. Phil was demonstrating the "P"
>(*capital* P) parameter expansion flag, which zshexpn(1) describes thus:
>
># P This forces the value of the parameter name to be
># interpreted as a further parameter name, whose
># value will be used where appropriate. If used with
># a nested parameter or command substitution, the
...
Oops... This didn't appear in my manual. After some digging I found
that I was reading the old manual, for zsh 3, when this didn't exist
yet. Now I've cleaned the remnants of the old installation and I can
see the current manuals. Impressive! I'm starting to use some of the
new features, but it's just the beginning :-)
>To use this kind of parameter alias for setting, you can do
...
>% : ${(P)foo::=xxx}
>% echo ${(P)foo}
>xxx
>% echo $foo $bar
>bar xxx
>
>which also works where foo is an array reference such as "array[3]".
Thanks, I think I understood now. I wouldn't call it the simplest
thing to find out... In my case I'd have to do
% a[1]=name1 a[2]=name2 etc.
% b[1]=b_name1 b[2]=b_name2 etc.
and then to do the transfer
for ((i=1; i< number-of-elements; i++)) {
: ${(P)b[i]::=$a[i]}
}
However this is too much of a contortion to be useful... Is there a
way to do the whole assignment without a loop? Something like
${(P)b::=$a} or similar (yes, this one cannot work of course).
It seems that putting assignments like b_name1=$name1 b_name2=$name2
etc. in a function and simply calling it ends up working better. The
only advantage of using the loop above is that it's independent of the
number of elements, but I think this independence isn't worth the
trouble.
Thanks a lot to the developers in the list, the level of support is
amazing.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author