Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Why no useful defaults?
- X-seq: zsh-users 5795
- From: Andy Spiegl <zsh.Andy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ZSH User List <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Why no useful defaults?
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:06:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20030120184959.GC28632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Kreccount: 1
- Mail-followup-to: ZSH User List <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: KasCada Telekommunikation und Marketing GmbH
- References: <20030120103001.B2388@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030120170518.GM3966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030120122248.A8696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030120184959.GC28632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Hm, most of the people I'm showing zsh and trying to convince them
> > that it's A LOT better than bash see the default prompt and say yuck.
>
> What does the default prompt have to do with it? The default bash prompt
> is 'bash-[version#]$ '; eg "bash-2.05a$ ' - how much more interesting is
> that?
Oops, you're right. Sorry, I guess I haven't used bash for so long that I
forgot that :-)
But still, the fact that the bash prompt is ugly doesn't justify that the
default zsh prompt has to be ugly, too. Besides I wasn't only talking
about the prompt. All the nice features of zsh have to be turned on
manually first which I think is a shame.
But it seems that everyone on the list is happy and you don't want to
"convert" bash users to zsh. Well, I don't care, just wanted to help with
an idea. :-(
Chau,
Andy.
--
http://peru.spiegl.de Our project
http://radiomaranon.org.pe Radio Marañón, Jaén, Perú
o _ _ _
------- __o __o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) -o)
----- _`\<,_ _`\<,_ _>(_) (_)/<_ \_| \ _|/' \/ /\\
---- (_)/ (_) (_)/ (_) (_) (_) (_) (_)' _\o_ _\_v
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you keep doing what you've always done,
you'll get what you've always gotten.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author