Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@

[Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

# Andrey.Borzenkov@xxxxxxxxxxx / 2003-01-22 09:28:35 +0300:
> > >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> >     Peter> There's no-one here but us chickens.  This sounds OK by me,
> >     Peter> are there any violent objections?
> > 
> >     Peter> Oliver tends to deal with a lot of the Sunsite-related
> >     Peter> stuff... do you want to decide finally about this, Oliver?
> > 
> > How about require a zsh specific header like:
> > 
> >     X-zsh: ....
> > 
> > Non X-zsh email will be bounced with a warning message.
> > 
> > Advantage:
> >     * no need for confirmation wait
> >     * reduce network traffic
> > 
> > DisAdvantage:
> >     * add this header when posting
> 
> I personally say "no" unless you explain how to add custom headers to mail
> sent to specific address only in Outlook.

    Just say "no" (to Outlook)!

    seriously though: how many people on the list use zsh on Windows?

    but this is all void: it's job of the server software to take care
    of the users -> workers forwarding, and posters should not be forced
    to do anything special about it.
 
-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html