Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
RE: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
- X-seq: zsh-users 5851
- From: Borzenkov Andrey <Andrey.Borzenkov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Karsten Thygesen'" <karthy@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Roman Neuhauser'" <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:40:24 +0300
- Cc: "'zsh users'" <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, staff@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <86hec1hwo2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
>
> Roman> 1) zsh-users@ (that's what we specifically talked about,
> Roman> could cover -workers@ if needed) will be protected by
> Roman> qconfirm, which means that non-subscribers will be required to
> Roman> confirm their posts.
>
> Is that really required based on traffic since saturday? Last
> saturday, we installed Messagewall for all sunsite mails, so the
> spam/vira level should have dropped to a pretty low level. So is the
> request still valid? Have you seen a lot spam since saturday?
>
the spam volume has decreased but it is still there. Lists known to me that
do use confirmation do not have spam at all. Some other high-volume lists
(lkml as the very good example) have much better signal to noise ratio
comparing with zsh lists.
-andrey
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author