Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Honoring a command
- X-seq: zsh-users 7327
- From: DervishD <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Honoring a command
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:59:18 +0200
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1040405010932.ZM22507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Pleyades
- References: <20040401170312.GA25965@DervishD> <1040403214330.ZM15892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040404111615.GI27014@DervishD> <1040405010932.ZM22507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Bart :)
* Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:
> } The number of beers I owe you is growing dangerously ;)
> Especially considering that I rarely drink beer. Send me a six-pack of
> some unusual Spanish soft drink, or something. ;-}
I think the only soft drinks we have in Spain are from abroad,
but I'll take a look ;))
> } alias scriptinit=$'emulate -L zsh ; trap \'return $LINENO\' ZERR'
> An interesting tidbit I just noticed -- if you read the script with the
> "source" or "." commands, $LINENO is reset to 1 when the trap runs, so
> you don't get as useful a return value.
I know, but I never source that scrips (is there any way to make
a script as 'unsourceable' :?). This ZERR thing for returning an
error code is not very solid :( I should work in a better one, but I
had never the need O:)
> } { whatever.command 2> /dev/null || print "Error message";false}
> Actually that won't work either, because that _always_ executes "false".
> I think you meant
> { whatever.command 2> /dev/null || { print "Error message";false } }
Yes, I forgot the braces, sorry O:)
> } but then 'verbosely_watch' has no purpose at all!
> You could write another little function:
> verbosely_fail() {
> local ret=$?
> [[ -p /dev/fd/1 ]] && print "$*"
> return ret
> }
That's nice :)
>
> Now this works:
>
> { whatever.command || verbosely_fail "Error message" } 2>/dev/null |
> verbosely_watch "Doing whatever"
>
> If you DON'T pipe to verbosely_watch, then verbosely_fail is silent and the
> ZERR trap returns the line number as $?. (Even if you do pipe it, the line
> number is stored in $pipestatus[1], which may be useful for other tricks.)
>
> } I think I'd better use 'scriptinit' only for muted
> } scripts and verbosely_watch for the rest, using TRAPZERR for the
> } error message. Is that a good idea?
> That would work as well, but it means the error message is the same for
> every command (unless you re-assign it somehow each time).
That's not a problem, I can use a global variable for the message
and reassign it before each command is run, instead of redefining
TRAPZERR (and obviously I must make TRAPZERR output that variable).
Finally I think that the solution I'm going to adopt is the
function 'verbosely_watch', TRAPZERR for the error message instead
the OR list. I'm afraid that using ZERR to return the line number of
the error is only useful for debugging, to know where a bug happened,
but for production scripts I think is better to have a reduced and
well defined set of error return codes.
Thanks a lot for your, as always, invaluable help.
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author