Re: Proprositions for a useful categorization of zsh options?

[DervishD <raul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Hi Thorsten :)

 * Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit:
> >> autocd autonamedirs cdablevars
> > I would change the name POPD/PUSHD of the last category to simply
> > 'DIRS' and put those three there.
> Yes, "pushd/popd" is too specific compared to the the other ones who
> are far more general..., but is "DIRS" the appropriate term?

    Not at all. I have a gift to choose bad names O:))

> "Dealing somehow with dirs" seems a bit vague to me...

    You're right. A better name should be added.
 
> > A couple more could be moved to that 'DIRS' category.
> For instance?

    Don't remember right now, I saw a couple. But before that, a
proper name and description (and rationale) for the category must be
chosen.
 
> > In addition to this, a whole bunch of options present in
> > 'MISCELLANEOUS' category could be moved to another category,
> > meaning 'options related to zsh internals'
> Which options for instance? 

    I don't have your original mail at hand, but I was referring to
options like 'errexit'. I'm afraid I cannot explain better what I
have in mind, specially in English O:)
 
> > ( Now the misc category is simply too big and almost renders the
> > categorization useless :(
> My fight continues until the last miscellaneous option is categorised
> elsewhere... ;-)! 

    Nice ;))

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/