Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
In the tla completion function: "${(@P)var_cmd-*:FILE:_files}"
- X-seq: zsh-users 7867
- From: Haakon Riiser <haakon.riiser@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: In the tla completion function: "${(@P)var_cmd-*:FILE:_files}"
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:32:04 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
I was just browsing through the new completion function for tla
in zsh 4.2.1, and I was wondering about the expression shown in
the subject:
"${(@P)var_cmd-*:FILE:_files}"
>From what I've read in the manual, I'd guess that the @ flag is
a harmless bug that has no effect since $var_cmd is not an array,
and that the P flag makes the expression expand to the expansion of
the variable name contained in $var_cmd, if $var_cmd is defined;
if $var_cmd is not defined, I'd expect the expansion to give the
string after the '-':
*:FILE:_files
I tried it out in an interactive session, but the '-' expansion
doesn't work.
##
## This works:
##
% myvar=hello
% foo=myvar
% echo "${(@P)foo-bar}"
hello
##
## This does not:
##
% unset foo
% echo "${(@P)foo-bar}"
zsh: bad substitution
Is this a bug in the completion file that has gone unnoticed
because var_cmd has always been defined?
--
Haakon
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author