Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: correction

X-seq: zsh-users 8629
From: Paul Falstad <pfalstad@xxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: correction
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=gS7sH2hDDBKtNegyhdXiUZDe8oBAvO2cNgtOvO1Qdr9xmKba78uzShuJWQGuy745nvfoqPer11Gg1KQNlA0JZrgWyJwScK8R/fv5OuwYC3L0/mkAANGm655It/JMPe7NsuJRcPGLPXbAEdDdbzeQLuYezOcxEMoJkpiYLThZkJU= ;
In-reply-to: 6667
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

> This appears to have happened during the Interregnum, er, that is, before
> 1997, during the period when both of us were dissociated from zsh, in my
> case because I objected to the stated intent of the lead maintainers to
> rip out various csh-derived syntax and features.  IIRC this was when the
> word "junkie" got inserted into all the csh compatibility option names,
> in prep for dumping them entirely (which thankfully never happened).

I think I put in some of the csh_junkie_* option names.

> Anyway, the present correctall behavior you describe already appears in
> the oldest copy of 3.0 that I can lay hands on, but is "your way" in 2.4.

Oh, correctall, right.  For plain old "correct" (for commands only) I suppose
the new way makes sense, since unwanted spelling correction can't do much
damage.  For correctall, it can.  I suppose if I had smarter compctls or
whatever, I could avoid this problem.

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author