Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: which-command help
- X-seq: zsh-users 8855
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: which-command help
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:06:05 +0000
- Cc: Zsh User <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <200505171555.j4HFtUOb012962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20050517132000.GB9627@xxxxxxxxxx> <200505171447.j4HElTUj011344@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1050517153211.ZM27474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200505171555.j4HFtUOb012962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On May 17, 4:55pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: which-command help
}
} Well, your reply in that message was:
}
} > Suppose you have
} >
} > alias LL='ls -lL'
} >
} > Do you want run-help to display the man page for "ls", or do you want it
} > to simply fail because there is no LL command?
}
} Actually, it *doesn't* fail after the patch:
I know which-command doesn't fail. What about run-help?
} % which-command LL
} ls -lL
}
} I would have said that's more useful, because it's clearer
No disagreement there. I'm worried about shared code between two
widgets that (maybe) should have different behavior.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author