Re: Writing Zsh "libraries"

X-seq: zsh-users 10402

From: "Deliverable Mail" <deliverable@xxxxxxxxx>

To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: Writing Zsh "libraries"

Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:09:26 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nDzf55zyIYXkYPWRsW8QE0oIdFZocoJRWflq+1nXoZ0YsS28QOmnRH2nDeH25heBfr20zQHJdhh3fGrMmIAcxj1OlOjX/Q0XBIGxrFCzdPYDlAB+KBBomJbKI4lxxQuI4ebnVhk9W8lmVv5sr+WD40MOcTiUuq1sfcF931n9MwY=

In-reply-to: <200606200936.k5K9aKiX006265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm

References: <dbfc82860606190607m67b8579et4d3748fd66a2f85d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200606200936.k5K9aKiX006265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Can it become standardized behavior then?

Cheers,

Alexy

On 6/20/06, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"Nikolai Weibull" wrote:
> autoload -U zap/init
>
> Then I simply call the function as "zap/init" ($ZDOTDIR/functions is
> in my $fpath as well).
>
> This works and seems to be quite a nice way to handle namespacing, but
> perhaps I'm missing something vital here.
>
> Any comments?

I don't suppose anyone intended this to work, but the handling of paths
internally is generally fairly straightforward, so there's no reason why
you shouldn't use it if it works.

--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070

To access the latest news from CSR copy this link into a web browser:   http://www.csr.com/email_sig.php

References:

Writing Zsh "libraries"
- From: Nikolai Weibull
Re: Writing Zsh "libraries"
- From: Peter Stephenson

Reverse Date

Date

Thread

Author