Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh-lovers

X-seq: zsh-users 11726
From: Angel Olivera <redondos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh users list <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: zsh-lovers
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:30:07 -0300
In-reply-to: <fb3648c60708051123scfd6a81tc460f156fea4d13a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Zsh users list <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <fb3648c60708042251g594b3863qbc0345f77cff07b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070805115700.GA7353@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070805162219.GF77822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fb3648c60708051123scfd6a81tc460f156fea4d13a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun 05.Aug.07 12:23, fREW wrote:

I can't stand info; I use "man zshall" and do my searching in less.
It's so easy to zip through matches with "n" and "N", as opposed to
info where you have to hit "s <enter>" to go forward, and if you
overshoot there's no way to back up to the previous match.


I find searching with less extremely clumsy.  What's the syntax for a
for loop?  Try searching for a very common english word, for, and you
will very quickly get frustrated.

It's not that bad if you use anchors, e.g. '^ *for', but yeah, info hasmore powerful searching facilities.


--
redondos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- zsh-lovers
  - From: fREW
- Re: zsh-lovers
  - From: Stephane Chazelas
- Re: zsh-lovers
  - From: Dan Nelson
- Re: zsh-lovers
  - From: fREW

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author