Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [OT] Re: pretty easy thing but too hard for me! (random array element)
- X-seq: zsh-users 11799
- From: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] Re: pretty easy thing but too hard for me! (random array element)
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:00:13 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mdM+nBA6RpwXQcTffjcvJXa34Yz20/6/cifnhnzCt5+/cVdcDbhOTYYngg5foOYQqSXvl2RuHcpKArhZuv4GHIgaKY6LB4P4jPePDwlawnmLGn3gZztVrXeVEd9nm0wlwL9vORmWVEXLh6t7tnimrb0FRytyFuAq4SunRTW3iR0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DLNkEEdyxcxfVnHVqsrmAelRMC3Z7O63SHhfx3vOieDcaviSmbji/rJB3l+NB3diUbO6gyZqDNmFRxpvZAWOxN9G1Fh7W1tfzbprjlZ7w7KmMrTx2I7H+RFM/B0ZZm1X8asamjcM5Xl7ns44bT88J92YEGDwcCSqFibXX+6DJ/M=
- In-reply-to: <20070806173239.GJ19255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <fb3648c60708011423x64c03105i8a4a63b9ba2f55e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52841186014539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fb3648c60708051908p47a1a60elf59f16416bbad74b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2007-08-06T18-13-31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070806173239.GJ19255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 06/08/07, Angel Olivera <redondos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon 06.Aug.07 18:21, Michael Prokop wrote:
> >Just google for "List Reply-To considered harmful" for more
> >information.
>
> It's called "reply-to munging", a topic that arises so frequently in
> mailing lists that there should be an adage about it (such as Goldwin's
> law). Let's please not get into pointless, endless arguments. :-)
I do not want to start any flamewar and since I switched (most of) my
lists to GMail, I benefit from its strange auto-reply-to-list magic anyway,
but for completeness, let everyone read both the anti [1] and the pro [2]
stance on mungling. And yes, I mungle the lists I admin. And no, I will
not participate in any ensuing discussion. People's minds tend to be
made up on this issue already, anyway :)
[1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
[2] http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author