Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Which versiosn of ZSH of WS instead of NUL as result seperator

X-seq: zsh-users 11870
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Richard Hartmann" <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>, "zsh users" <zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which versiosn of ZSH of WS instead of NUL as result seperator
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:02:46 -0700
In-reply-to: <2d460de70709230707p6c934a84tee4bb2491cc3d19d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <2d460de70709230707p6c934a84tee4bb2491cc3d19d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sep 23,  4:07pm, Richard Hartmann wrote:
} 
} the vim source mentions that 'some' versions of zsh use as WS
} instead of NUL for the seperation of the result list. Does anyone
} know which versions that would be?

A little context would help here.

Result list of what?

References:
- Which versiosn of ZSH of WS instead of NUL as result seperator
  - From: Richard Hartmann

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author