Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ulimit differences between zsh and bash on Linux
- X-seq: zsh-users 11916
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ulimit differences between zsh and bash on Linux
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:30:03 +0100
- In-reply-to: <305416.7782.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <305416.7782.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Daniel Qarras wrote:
> on a Linux system I have set following limits (only) on
> /etc/security/limits.conf:
>
> * soft core 0
> * hard core 32768
>
> When I use bash I get this:
>
> $ ulimit -Hc
> 32768
>
> But with zsh CVS I get this:
>
> $ ulimit -Hc
> 65536
>
> Both shells should measure core limit as blocks so is there a bug in
> zsh or am I missing something?
I get the same results. zsh is definitely using 512, the traditional
block size, which as far as I know is correct. Is bash? If it were
using 1024 that would explain the difference.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author