Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-4_2-patches branch
- X-seq: zsh-users 12275
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh-4_2-patches branch
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:04:24 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20071203033751.GE18254@sverige>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: CSR
- References: <20071203033751.GE18254@sverige>
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 03:37:51 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <pda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've finished the back-merging of many bug-fixes onto the 4.2 branch,
> as well as most completions (the notable exceptions being 22328 and
> 23479). The ChangeLog on the branch should match the changes committed
> to the branch, but I wouldn't be surprised by a mistake or two given
> the hundreds of changes I looked at. I've also sanitized all the
> branch's .distfiles using Peter's check_dist_files script.
(I've moved this onto zsh-users.)
Many thanks for all the work... it's been about two years since the last
release, so it's a huge task even without disk failures etc.
I've uploaded
ftp://ftp.zsh.org/pub/development/zsh-4.2.6-dev-1.tar.gz
for anyone tracking the current stable branch to try out. Since I suspect
people using that branch really just want a straighforward upgrade I'll
probably turn it into 4.2.7 within the next few days.
> If anyone cares, I also have the list of change numbers I looked at,
> but didn't merge. These were not all just new features, but some fixes
> didn't merge cleanly or compile properly, sometimes only because of
> extra parameters on something like zerr(). I didn't attempt to guess
> at a resolution for these problems, but left the changes out.
Realistically, anything left will probably have to wait for 4.4.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author