Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: idea for new feature (was: Re: sticky-note and zle bindings)
- X-seq: zsh-users 12467
- From: "Matt Wozniski" <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: idea for new feature (was: Re: sticky-note and zle bindings)
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:36:40 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=hUJ68eDsjgHWL81qUbeUg4YUAgHfkWCXhNAH/ug77cM=; b=DyVXPWhj0/N4u2PT3+00OW+xslkoYG+7u2IMbHe705SprnXgfgBgksKlhaokHIY5SQAWV/MpFdk1IcwiSlxMEmDb4on98TVyqxpiKuGrjYII43bcL/3+eyNQ6zXFpb04w0qO8xyugflc8+cWZhACUeRT4ub7vozmBsA+H8rX/2k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FzIv+6ZuZXBoXEWACnrcGq3S+6gwh3eO9x/uuDIDHABfTtB6qc+7fiJyyVslltJVE2/IpsiYwx8Pc9UxdZRAWW2vBieNr3lyZqXdr2VtKIoPx6omO1X4ZpRFhWj3+8829pCV3R7iAsF91k/VNGSiocfYFZG2LGDwtcXhFZ8cWB8=
- In-reply-to: <080119160103.ZM16785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <237967ef0801040304h494987bv939bf6ff9541123f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <080113000048.ZM15017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080116131048.GC16058@xxxxxxxxx> <080116075915.ZM12209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080116171253.GF16058@xxxxxxxxx> <080116191103.ZM12889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080117172603.GA664@xxxxxxxxx> <691a5d910801180119p32d48643wa55fd2aefaa3bf6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080119222458.GB22430@xxxxxxxxx> <080119160103.ZM16785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: godlygeek@xxxxxxxxx
On Jan 19, 2008 7:01 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> It's possible to configure xterm to not respond to these sequences,
> and the window manager can suppress others.
>
> } Do you know from which version on it should be implemented?
>
> No, but another poster said it's been several years. I have what seems
> to be v.192 (based on RPM version string) and it responds to all of
> them except "get_title".
Getting the title via control sequence is often compiled out for
security reasons. See http://securityvulns.com/Edocument128.html ,
the "window title reporting" section. The long and short of it is so
that a malicious text file, when cat'ed (or something similar), can't
set the title to a command, request the title (this putting the title
on the command line in the absense of a 'read'), and trick the user
into pressing enter.
~Matt
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author