Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Using the same completion function for various commands
- X-seq: zsh-users 15619
- From: JÃrÃmie Roquet <arkanosis@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Using the same completion function for various commands
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:31:11 +0100
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3JdS/DRpsQzjybuOTezf87IpIChwE14b4alLT8CYRE4=; b=Y7t7jnxE5nLV+p0jz7Ho0zqBwJnLlvf5aaJFrGRU/YEBynvpsFo3OrApxbeuegykdL nxKJgjOXqamZzd4zNaZ/duwGNCaZ/9PgTaoH76M9H5UAhM3wnwpxra2Thl1dpowxW47t q7V3nb2T1YsSaP2OelrYw1mZjeOaHKYsJ3q/s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m4LI3sfD9a1u1ssc3/E8kqdsjRjWBipPycT+SXGQT+Oz/qxXN0khYLGPayGED/XYT3 /Coc9eAYUYCam4dBqaNWKe0WcuWKJxRZtE9PX2wEdqFhn6eLDEpUrf7NwTTueSGCWCqp 56uaQCL5FSnAywE+yTKHg4JePL4aO3PgrL3EQ=
- In-reply-to: <20101206151124.389fd287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <201012061512.21791.mrichter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimY=rEETn1uOdkDJ33kGE=YUDAvevsBvvvMU7YL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim1Ac1-VOkRQ1NXn_qL6-EV06bagVkK7y_UThwB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin+NCoBRzx90fo+s0z7urCCoTA6T3cXTYdt_VD2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101206151124.389fd287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2010/12/6 Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@xxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:03:51 +0100
> Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2010/12/6 JÃrÃmie Roquet <arkanosis@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > 2010/12/6 Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> You can also do this in your .zshrc instead of in the completer if
>> >> you wish, just write
>> >> compdef _foo -p 'foo_*'
>> >>
>> >> At least that's what the documentation says, it doesn't seem to
>> >> work that well.
>> >
>> > It works fine for me with 4.3.10, did I miss something?
>>
>> When i tried compdef _du -p foo_\*, i only got single-letter options
>> completed.
>>
>
> That means it's working perfectly. ÂIt's hitting this line at the top of
> _du
>
> Â_pick_variant gnu=Free\ Soft unix --version /dummy/no-such-file
>
> and deciding, quite reasonably in my opinion, that foo_\* is not a GNU
> variant of du. ÂSo it's going to the other branch, where the options are
> simpler.
I'm getting some weird behaviour with some commands, though. For example :
$ aap -<tab>
-- -- end of options, targets and assignments follow
--changed -- consider specified file changed
--command -c -- execute a command after reading the recipe
--contents -C -- only build when file contents changed
<snip>
$ compdef _aap bar
$ bar -<tab>
-- -- end of options, targets and assignments follow
--changed -- consider specified file changed
--command -c -- execute a command after reading the recipe
--contents -C -- only build when file contents changed
<snip>
$ compdef _aap -p baz
$ baz -<tab>
zsh: do you wish to see all 1152 possibilities (1154 lines)?<y>
option
--
--changed
--command
--contents
<snip>
<space>
<space>
<snip>
-c
-C
-k
<snip>
<space>
<space>
<snip>
-- end of options, targets and assignments follow
-- consider specified file changed
-- execute a command after reading the recipe
<snip>
I guess there is something wrong in _aap, but I don't understand why
the behaviour is different with and without the -p
Best regards,
--
JÃrÃmie
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author