On Nov 18, 10:50am, Daniel Serodio wrote:
} Subject: Re: Auto-correct and newly-added commands
}
} Bart Schaefer wrote:
}> On Nov 14, 4:31pm, Daniel Serodio (lists) wrote:
}> }
}> } It it possible to have zsh automatically run "rehash" after I reply no
}> } to an auto-correct prompt, so it "learns" this new command?
}>
}> That would certainly seem logical. Also it seems strange to load up
}> the command tables and check them for proper spellings when the word
}> that is being checked is not in the command position to begin with.
} Hmm, maybe my explanation wasn't clear (or I don't understand your
} reply), but I only have problem with real commands (in the beginning of
} the line), not with their arguments. Or did you mention "words not in
} the command position" from reviewing the code and not my explanation?
The latter (that's the first hunk of the patch).
}> What this patch does is reset the incremental path search in the event
}> the correction is rejected. That allows whatever hashing options the
}> user has specified to kick in at the time the path is searched during
}> command execution, rather than having to test them all here.
} This sounds like what I need, but when I tried to apply this patch, it
} failed (both on zsh 4.3.12 and on a fresh git clone).
I'm not sure why it would have failed on 4.3.12, but it's already been
committed to sourceforge CVS so a fresh git of the very latest probably
won't need to have it applied.
What was the failure message from patch? Did you use "patch -p0" ?