Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zargs: unexpected, non-xargs behaviour
- X-seq: zsh-users 17059
- From: Moritz Bunkus <moritz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zargs: unexpected, non-xargs behaviour
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:24:36 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bunkus.org; s=mail201203; t=1336400678; bh=Zvd4AODxjJyYGRSjuTVHnUJFvi4Wy85uJ+BJQXA2JnA=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Content-Type; b=hJzdZ2v7i8ouqxeKWVcbjD8cR6RXm4TB/jWWLxe62krXhcR5cyEzSwShcpSHKA3HW mbFJUrR/mcVzCFQrjl6edW7bLLufnMSZHa6DY6SmEbmc0rzYlkq2jFNQ+uPimvuVq9 48gbekZachli9MM4va1ywyiafR/rAJmzy1E7EHmU=
- In-reply-to: <120507071434.ZM10459@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20120507084141.GA8366@lohen.blott-online.com> <120507071434.ZM10459@torch.brasslantern.com>
Hey,
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the comments in the zargs function file:
Well, then zargs is not POSIX compliant if I read
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/utilities/xargs.html
right as the POSIX documentation does not mention aborting if there
are more than "-n arg" arguments in total. On the contrary, it talks
about using fewer than "arg" if there are less _during the last
iteration_.
Kind regards,
mo
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author