Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: There is a serious inefficiency in the way zsh handles wildcards
- X-seq: zsh-users 19059
- From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx>, zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: There is a serious inefficiency in the way zsh handles wildcards
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:01:35 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CAHAq8pF=hB4sfx+Fe6nfnbJ8W7E9r9e_mHytBdu=Oy_6CWukJA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre
- References: <CAHAq8pF=hB4sfx+Fe6nfnbJ8W7E9r9e_mHytBdu=Oy_6CWukJA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:27:48 -0300
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ---%<---
> diff -up zsh-5.0.2/Src/pattern.c.orig zsh-5.0.2/Src/pattern.c
> --- zsh-5.0.2/Src/pattern.c.orig 2014-09-03 12:21:44.673792750 -0300
> +++ zsh-5.0.2/Src/pattern.c 2014-09-03 12:22:28.069303587 -0300
> @@ -2911,6 +2911,10 @@ patmatch(Upat prog)
> break;
> case P_STAR:
> /* Handle specially for speed, although really P_ONEHASH+P_ANY */
> + while (P_OP(next) == P_STAR) {
> + scan = next;
> + next = PATNEXT(scan);
> + }
> case P_ONEHASH:
> case P_TWOHASH:
> /*
> ---%<---
>
> Do you believe this patch is OK?
In other words, if we're handling a "*" down in the pattern code --- as
you say, we've already decided higher up if it's the special ** or ***
for directories so there's no problem with those --- we can skip any
immediately following *s because they don't add anything but will provoke
horrifically inefficient recursion. (That's because when backtracking
we keep trying each separate * from each position --- the number of
possibilities is humongous.)
Yes, that sounds entirely reasonable. It doesn't patch cleanly any
more; I think the following works and I've added a new test (all tests
pass).
diff --git a/Src/pattern.c b/Src/pattern.c
index 94a299e..adc73c1 100644
--- a/Src/pattern.c
+++ b/Src/pattern.c
@@ -3012,6 +3012,16 @@ patmatch(Upat prog)
break;
case P_STAR:
/* Handle specially for speed, although really P_ONEHASH+P_ANY */
+ while (P_OP(next) == P_STAR) {
+ /*
+ * If there's another * following we can optimise it
+ * out. Chains of *'s can give pathologically bad
+ * performance.
+ */
+ scan = next;
+ next = PATNEXT(scan);
+ }
+ /*FALLTHROUGH*/
case P_ONEHASH:
case P_TWOHASH:
/*
diff --git a/Test/D02glob.ztst b/Test/D02glob.ztst
index 4697ca4..217ce7c 100644
--- a/Test/D02glob.ztst
+++ b/Test/D02glob.ztst
@@ -565,3 +565,10 @@
print $match[1]
0:(#q) is ignored completely in conditional pattern matching
>fichier
+
+# The following should not cause excessive slowdown.
+ print glob.tmp/*.*
+ print glob.tmp/**************************.*************************
+0:Optimisation to squeeze multiple *'s used as ordinary glob wildcards.
+>glob.tmp/ra=1.0_et=3.5
+>glob.tmp/ra=1.0_et=3.5
Thanks.
pws
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author