Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: `[[ -n $VAR ]]` equal to `[[ $VAR ]]`?
- X-seq: zsh-users 20119
- From: Kurtis Rader <krader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: `[[ -n $VAR ]]` equal to `[[ $VAR ]]`?
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:31:04 -0700
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <mg78mg$vqb$1@ger.gmane.org>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <mg78mg$vqb$1@ger.gmane.org>
When I run the following
[[ $VAR ]] && print yes
I get a parse error. Which is what I expected given the documentation in
section "Conditional Expressions" of "man zshall". Are you seeing different
behavior? What makes you think a bare variable is a valid expression?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Thorsten Kampe <thorsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is kind of a follow-up to
> http://www.zsh.org/mla/users/2011/msg00284.html .
>
> Basically the solutions were `((+VAR))` for zsh and `[[ -n
> ${VAR+stuff} ]]` for bash and zsh.
>
> Now my question is, isn't `[[ -n $VAR ]]` equivalent to `[[ $VAR ]]`?
> (`[[ -n ${VAR+stuff} ]]` equivalent to `[[ ${VAR+stuff} ]]`)
>
> Thorsten
>
>
--
Kurtis Rader
Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author