Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh 5.1 released [user]
- X-seq: zsh-users 20528
- From: Axel Beckert <abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh 5.1 released [user]
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 21:37:43 +0200
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAAAAAC3mUtaAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAADh0RVh0U29mdHdhcmUAWFYgVmVyc2lvbiAzLjEwYSAgUmV2OiAxMi8yOS85NCAoUE5HIHBhdGNoIDEuMindFS5JAAACGElEQVQ4jXXQMU8UYRDG8f8shNjdDH4AbpfGDjAWlKiJiZ0ajL1aGCvsNCbGaCGG1koLaztaTYz6ATy+gOyehYmF3MxVxgg3FnDsHcTpJr/M+8w7Rf6nCsaVTTDqxbg9hoOXmw83H71+Eyfg4E1d7/Z2fG9rGkZbTQiu+K+3U/C+76lmkvAhJuDndnoAiftou4V84okAGclop4U/jYACZDTxrYWP0gkxVfAm/W//GLZpxIzwIN0Hn8dw0B+IWkZmQmRsj2HfhwokEklHfNCCiQCRgAR7YyhQVRVTCKCzP4Y5zBBE0t0zY3Q8oQaBqqAMlVEcgVQd9706zGirAFium8HXumlMIeMwqQCInju+2+uB6MRENupdpMt8pRlHZyuAW0F+Mb6XSIVqtxjD+iVmVqqystLEzFTGT92YqRaXpNT5eTVjeJhbALPnrTxLUZUKZsgxcNm64hAOYisT/xhF+oKTGU5RegtC3Rt6eEDi/QnIevdTx9Md2EMmYBRmCQR1026FCGQQJJExsRUqgkMGaWSbwYLnoO4T6VgpbQbdELPMBAHWWrhYrcxXnYgAsatPWygkFCBD4K62MAsOTqA6szYRPpsu6e6Y8mPiVrBMNuGIMrgwBUu4p2DgG1Ownu6hpuTv7hScefHAzAC/yRRw5U5pALMbJ4AUALvHSZhxgHPXTsHcdWD1GadAHr9avP+c0wCr7263Df8ASLwXWHWs+KIAAAAHdElNRQfYBQEBODPr
- In-reply-to: <55EC72F1.20702@eastlink.ca> <55EC7426.3050305@eastlink.ca>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: DeuxChevaux.org -- The Citroën 2CV Database
Hi Ray,
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 10:08:01AM -0700, Ray Andrews wrote:
> Thanks Axel, part of my worries is that some of this is from Debian
> and some via manual install, just as you say. I wonder how much
> overlap there is,
If you haven't passed any specific --prefix or so to your ./configure
call, they should not overlap. At least I never noticed any place
where they do. (./configure by default installs to /usr/local/bin and
/usr/local/etc), debian packages to /usr/bin, /etc and in case of zsh
also /bin.)
> If I uninstall zsh completely, as far as apt is concerned, and then
> install the manual package, will things be done cleanly?
I assume so, yes. (But I also assume it would be safe with the zsh
package from Debian installed. :-)
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 10:13:10AM -0700, Ray Andrews wrote:
> On 09/06/2015 09:57 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > zsh 5.1 is available in Debian Unstable as 5.1-1 currently. If you
> > have unstable in your sources.list, you can install it directly
> > via apt.
>
> That sounds like a good idea. I track testing tho. Can I force
> 5.1-1 as a one-time exception?
Yes, but it involves /etc/apt/preferences fiddling to lower unstable's
pin priority. (And you need to add a "unstable" deb-line to your
sources.list of course.)
I use the following in /etc/apt/preferences on my systems running
Testing:
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 300
> Or I wonder if I should stick to manual install.
Can't decide that for you, especially because I'm surely biased as
Debian' zsh package maintainer. ;-)
If you uninstall the zsh debian package, make sure,
/usr/local/bin/zsh* is mentioned in your /etc/shells file and
/etc/passwd contains a still installed zsh for your user.
Kind regards, Axel
--
/~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert
\ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mail)
X See http://www.nonhtmlmail.org/campaign.html | abe@xxxxxxxxx (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://abe.noone.org/ (Web)
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author