Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: possible 'is-at-least' bug?

On Dec 7, 11:25am, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
} Subject: Re: possible 'is-at-least' bug?
}
} On 2015-12-05 01:29:46 -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
} > `is-at-least` isn't intended to be that general.
} > 
} > To do so would require a great deal more complexity.
} 
} No, zsh already implements numeric sorting for the "n" parameter
} expansion flag.

That's not the complexity he means.  Right now is-at-least splits up
the string on dots and dashes by the simple expedient of setting $IFS.
To also split "1a1" and "1b2" etc. on the non-space between the numbers
and the letters, would require quite a bit more effort.
Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author