Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Can be newest completions used with e.g. 5.0.2, or 4.x
- X-seq: zsh-users 21617
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Can be newest completions used with e.g. 5.0.2, or 4.x
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:16:35 +0000
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=W2r4Q0YMc6cVVJS27HdnEQY5Khg=; b=Q+vNSs 4NLqI9vOQHgslt2Fmin+QmO4ly8g7qhA6JZDnit9wv7HXOGTfqlu/AJlH54nogE/ 9shO+nPDOhIgTVHbEhSwNLalW9ZkBB3ksCjP6WOrnC5/5aP4HM9v7PcV2BDqElC+ mnuOGSsCc76VJwVz67bChvWneXVFh33OJzZb0=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=W2r4Q0YMc6cVVJS27HdnEQY5Khg=; b=CWYCM ttEeMwEo6iEhu4FPJGKSnjfTsd+3d9wiF5DVTMQ1Wz0uQy0fv/MFqRqLwP1OHCDW XzPy3lreHiP9QrRbk8g5Ms25Eq5QdJ4E4UItnHy7Sjr/p2OqOqOVOBc81vlgngu8 C3Dq1cPzoHeskSq01zGQFSl39bKF8lz647IiJg=
- In-reply-to: <CAKc7PVDmKDoGFgAyVyDAC9gfttQk9-YeUoKiV-Tff4NnkszXjA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAKc7PVDmKDoGFgAyVyDAC9gfttQk9-YeUoKiV-Tff4NnkszXjA@mail.gmail.com>
Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:27:47 +0200:
> Hello,
> I will test this, but an information about what changes in Zsh can
> influence completions' backward compatibility would be useful. I
> recall one thing, the ability to do =() right after typeset -a. If one
> person uses this in current completion, it will not be backward
> compatible. Any more such things?
The ${(b)foo} syntax has been added.
The _cmdstring completion function has been added.
Some completion library functions have received bugfixes (_arguments) or
new features (_describe).
There might be new builtin parameters, but I don't recall one aimed at
completion functions specifically.
Cheers,
Daniel
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author