Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Are completions in some way heavy?

X-seq: zsh-users 21627
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Are completions in some way heavy?
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 22:53:25 +0000
Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <160606090104.ZM11947__15732.477248139$1465228961$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <CAKc7PVBnpkEnkWZb4yh9BgutbBgfKS0Hh1x6e_Q-jnOyVDHQOg@mail.gmail.com> <160606090104.ZM11947__15732.477248139$1465228961$gmane$org@torch.brasslantern.com>

Bart Schaefer wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:01:04 -0700:
> On Jun 6,  2:43pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
> } Also, overall, it would be nice that I would collect all mainstream _*
> } patches, and provide the completions for all Zsh versions.
> 
> Having a location from which to grab .../share/$ZSH_VERSION/functions/
> trees for past zsh releases would be useful, particularly if fixes from
> more recent versions were backported when possible.

Sebastian, your project currently only covers completion functions
(Completion/**/*), not runtime functions (Functions/**/*); do you plan
to cover the latter too?

The "most fixes made in master are applicable to older versions too"
point applies to non-completion functions too, after all.

Cheers,

Daniel

References:
- Are completions in some way heavy?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author