Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Next release (5.3)
- X-seq: zsh-users 21754
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Next release (5.3)
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:01:02 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20160712075849.GG1537__20664.8654224866$1468310440$gmane$org@isis.sigpipe.cz>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <160707102031.ZM23611@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160712075849.GG1537__20664.8654224866$1468310440$gmane$org@isis.sigpipe.cz>
Roman Neuhauser wrote on Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:58:49 +0200:
> # schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2016-07-07 10:20:31 -0700:
> > But that's only because I've not worked out a case where I want anything
> > different. It's too difficult to come up with a categorical answer because
> > it depends whether the user is used to CHASE_BLAH behaviour (I'm not
> > suggesting option-specific behaviour, either).
>
> Has anyone brought up any realistic (as in: I'm going to use it for
> such-and-such) scenario for these CHASE_FOO-related variations?
> It looks like you're spending energy on something no one has any use for.
Not that I know of. The behaviour of :A was originally reported as
a bug downstream (debian bug #607615 by Vincent), but that ticket does
not refer to CHASE_*.
Cheers,
Daniel
> --
> roman
>
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author