Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-5.2-test-3
- X-seq: zsh-users 22184
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh-5.2-test-3
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 03:09:56 +0000
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=2tHUXibGkccDpYzeogWXCr277Yg=; b=j9sPNgtrCZRGQqk2vOaay AO8EeAl3zeIlztdFnTJ+E7ZytWTNkKtP1hGPSEGjJ8sQKrLLeXppqBBZWfknobCz ziyKOzKWy+MleBJD5e0KmXRIfxYqO3/3/FHWnnJAzRJUARj7q3XlyouyxACm2NZx 52pnx7rt8r81Mmfm2zHiKo=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=2tHUXibGkccDpYzeogWXCr277Yg=; b=f/SAcv3WNLiPHl7IM0xG ToEN4BDOqzQOQmMRN/aC4Z9goIDK9vQm+++4gBG5GVykI9BbHbbi4yZGxMtDEpSC Nt/I6diD7EpeWvFWkCAbotmVH4/W2vh/S/LlGvIRe8quRn1rUXlEajM+qXCNqthR Z1VSg/nCxbbEDuusUvfPsto=
- In-reply-to: <584CB4EF.6070904__42420.2079572298$1481423945$gmane$org@eastlink.ca>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CGME20161206195028epcas2p3c53119ab37952571be3238cdf228d88f@epcas2p3.samsung.com> <20161206194916.10448440@ntlworld.com> <20161209095729.2033b5be@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20161209195457.27e43234@ntlworld.com> <584CB4EF.6070904__42420.2079572298$1481423945$gmane$org@eastlink.ca>
Ray Andrews wrote on Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 18:07:43 -0800:
> $ make -s
>
> compmatch.c:774:15: warning: ‘savl’ may be used uninitialized in
> this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
False positive. (The other one — not quoted — is in bin_print().)
> BTW, if there a 'make check' that only shows errors or warnings? No need to
> see all the stuff that's fine.
You could eliminate a few lines of output at the top by passing -s to
'make check', as you already do for 'make all'. The per-file harness
messages are unconditional, however. (And we might want not to add
complexity there...)
Cheers,
Daniel
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author