Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: using gitlab (or other) issue tracker instead of mailing list?
- X-seq: zsh-users 22349
- From: Timothee Cour <timothee.cour2@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: using gitlab (or other) issue tracker instead of mailing list?
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:34:23 -0800
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PL3BO0foe6Q7NibqAiOPy8atOpPZsZaXb/wf9jb6CBs=; b=HZ8rWsokczqW1rS9sB12rzQmYxsUUyvj7BH1+D6rAA/1oKYTrvGzObDNMcnK3/eovc DmlAc/8H1e67nRoEnQy+iCHzCu/6XGStYKVjmdC5IHDxgZ6TMq6krlt06dBgukhRl2zH gE/y5sUyzNyNJO62Zla7v/BoRPe3vIUHgB1gsS+Q5OLYalQPh6NIKKVevIxonnaPc/5m ZZMlMZpRYjQW4rP/zLKT4s4kq1mq1ATLsl1nLmkd06p1Zd1Riv4U1HgEoerBfx4OE5an KC4ahLq9MOrN/jySxt5hmaZ7b0uQabYA3EM1FsSxE4nLdF3xHOHPd2J2SXKBJz5mnbwB aCpA==
- In-reply-to: <170102134231.ZM24370@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAM4j=kPgw=fLgEeCvV5xqpU9==o81riHj7RwowgQR3nwNnhZxA@mail.gmail.com> <170102134231.ZM24370@torch.brasslantern.com>
>> But I feel I have to advocate for those who oppose any solution which
requires signing up anywhere as I can understand those people very well.
On this topic:
when I try to send an email to zsh-users@xxxxxxx from my main gmail
(foo@gmail) using a different 'From' field (foo2@gmail) it sends an
automated response:
Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed: zsh-users@xxxxxxx Message
will be retried for 0 more day(s)
[and keeps failing]
so i need to log to my other gmail (foo2@gmail) that i signed-up with to
this mailing list. So looks like there is still a need to sign-up with this
approach?
[not using my primary email because this mailing list shows email in the
open, unlike bug-trackers like the ones I listed]
Or am i doing something wrong?
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On Dec 31, 5:10pm, Timothee Cour wrote:
> }
> } What are your requirements for tracking zsh issues, and could this be
> } accomplished by a standard issue tracker (eg github/gitlab/bitbucket)
> } instead of this mailing list ?
>
> I think the answer to the "instead" part of that question is "no,"
> if only because of the long-standing practice of linking changes to
> discussion threads by use of the list archive article number.
>
> My personal requirements for any tracker that isn't the zsh-workers
> mailing list are (1) somebody else is responsible for operating it;
> (2) it's at least as useful to those of us who are updating the code
> as it is to the people who just want to report problems; and (3) I
> no longer have to carry on this discussion.
>
> By way of relatively recent analogy, we switched version control from
> CVS to git because the people who were proponents of the change got
> involved with the process, and provided suggestions/assistance/tools,
> and in several cases actually became involved in code maintenance.
> Without that degree of commitment to whatever bug tracker you propose
> we adopt, continuing to push it is just a distraction.
>
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author