On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:53:00 -0500
Scott Frazer <frazer.scott@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, M-x complete-word does indeed work! I still need to try some of the
patches from later in this thread ...
Glad it's not totally shrouded in obscurity...
Would generally recommend the combination of complete-word as binding
for tab + use of the expand completer (which I fixed somewhere else in
this thread but am still to commit) as this is much more configurable.
To turn it on you'd do something like
zstyle ':completion:*' completer _expand _complete _ignored
bindkey '^i' complete-word
but there are many more exotic possibilities.
I'll have a look at expand-or-complete word, too.
(Ideally, in fact, whether or not we expand ~[whatever] needs
configuring --- because this is dynamic completion you might decide to
expand it to freeze the path for future use. I'll look at that if I get
the chance. This is the sort of reason for using the expand completer
I'm talking about.)
pws