Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Extending zed
- X-seq: zsh-users 23430
- From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Extending zed
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:41:56 +0200
- Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YmVdUKAjG2kr93JBCUbHsJ5s3+RSAZrhwM3IoM8sg+g=; b=U05Ah5nibipkeiwkkNrTuFfYufjXhXqnzabNfpiM5TmidJ2qAQJrUtwBJfqD0rPl78 ZcVk83vESqJKhdukOVaPkjy98RahUtl3N11YpvfRKliWTPzTG3ASWWaUCxTxgain57cR tjYJ03HD4t95kOMDYrgMxsxOO7JPLJF9KWKZAn7rTVOLlzMBLMKFvnk78jOAs6+gc6Vr qmG+7RjJm6WzTmw4UUqifyF5STJCF/2i3V7hf5LzOFXlt4wxHKacZykBSzPj7qa/x29+ ncivcq6qPeoU1jZHIIHrY81/cFz4bUKl+rgUaZx91dAl4cPkOY+U4tjziwtFSeDKwgvi A+ZA==
- In-reply-to: <20180604083801eucas1p258b13dadf37a66e8a59e8714462d0577~06DN1ECXq0206402064eucas1p26@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-users-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CGME20180603055854epcas5p1e92f5a41384aeb9d1555751df74f57ee@epcas5p1.samsung.com> <CAKc7PVDas7ZvXA0CvR1opSH5Wz0d=FVj=NZHGSu2k3C_o=fGZQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180604083801eucas1p258b13dadf37a66e8a59e8714462d0577~06DN1ECXq0206402064eucas1p26@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
On 4 June 2018 at 10:37, Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 07:57:12 +0200
> Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That's why I'm thinking about extending Zed.
>
> I'd suggest calling it something else --- such as ezed. Zed itself
> is deliberately a minimal function that's designed for the
> limited purpose of editing small functions inline; bells and
> whistles belong somewhere else.
It seems that name `ezed' would actually help the idea of not-so-bad
Zsh-builtin-editor. It's somewhat natural to use name ezed for it, not
zed, but cannot explain why.
Zed always gives me impression that I will touch something improper
and break the function or file I'm editing. Maybe we could set up few
things that will make zed more predictable? The page-up, page-down are
good example, before those binding the keys were calling history and
really breaking the viewport. Currently "u" key doesn't do undo and
breaks viewport, could I bind it? I would send a patch. Also, would it
be possible to implement ESC:wq, i.e. regular way of leaving vim-like
editor.
--
Best regards,
Sebastian Gniazdowski
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author