Re: Completion confusion around the _arguments -A flag

[dana <dana@xxxxxxx>]

On 22 Jul 2018, at 10:16, Mal Graty <mal@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>I have a binary (call it foo) with two, mutually exclusive, optional flags
>(that must come first) and a required arg. The problem I'm having is that
>when omitting both flags and using just the arg the completion tries to add
>one of the flags after it. Reading the docs lead me to the -A flag, however
>it doesn't seem to be preventing the flag completion despite being after
>the first arg. I'm hoping I've just overlooked something but for the life
>of me I can't see it.

For whatever it's worth, i don't see anything obviously wrong with your
function, and it works fine when i test it on 5.5. Maybe you have an option
enabled that changes the behaviour, idk

dana