On 16/07/2019 15:13, Ray Andrews wrote:
On 2019-07-16 1:43 a.m., Nick Cross wrote:Is there a way of 'inlining' the definition of common in foo so that I don't have to call it each time? ( but the source can still be separated out for maintenance purposes )Why would you want to? It's interpreted so there'd be almost no difference in speed even if you did actually inline it, no? Mind I suppose if 'common()' was autoloaded there might be a microsecond improvement but.
I realise its interpreted and it makes little or no difference, it was more out of curiosity ;-)
Nick