Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Help Request/Bug Report: comparguments causes _arguments to fail in certain cases
- X-seq: zsh-users 24821
- From: Dan Arad <dan1994@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-users@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Help Request/Bug Report: comparguments causes _arguments to fail in certain cases
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:24:03 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20200505164934.3f6b7f42@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-users-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAPPzoJDB3jB7pHUfE7UjY09OHk+r_pgLeYxuaoXhMFGHf-3UCQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200503165802.6540ad48@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <CAPPzoJDyK35bSMTyYKovEbRZNhDpKs1aeY2ZRjzBTxgdgCuGww@mail.gmail.com> <20200504131830.3572e317@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <CAPPzoJC6MYg8CEqsmLRPvPRYPLYP+dJxA4BCR0Cue6xTdZ9Q9g@mail.gmail.com> <20200505164934.3f6b7f42@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
>
> > > After _python returned, my script was invoked again and printed
> > > `BUFFER=python ps.py` and `words=python*3* ps.py` (note the 3).
>
> I'm not sure offhand where this comes from. $context, $funcstack, et al
> may have clues.
I may have neglected to say that I aliased `python` to `python3`, so it
makes sense since you said that words is the result of alias expansion.
You might try looking up the place that originally populates $words and
> making it stash a copy of $words in another, read-only array; then you'll
> be able to use «compset -P» and access that array. (Compare vcs_info's
> use of *_orig keys in ${hook_com}.)
I tried looking at things related to `vcs_info`, and I saw they were
outside of the Completion directory.
I was able to find the place where the `*_orig` keys are set, but couldn't
find where they are used.
It would be nice to get some context (or reference) about how this part of
zsh connects to compsys, and how variables like `hook_com` become available
to completion functions.
> Something along these lines, I think:
>
> local -a words2=( ${(z):-"$PREBUFFER${LBUFFER}x"} )
> words2[-1]=${words2[-1]%x}
> words2[1,${words2[(I)(;|&&|…)]}]=()
A lot for me to unpack here and in the paragraphs that follow.
I'll try to understand as much as I can, but will probably ask about it
later.
Thanks!
Dan
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:49 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Well, for starters, if you «shift words», you should decrement
> CURRENT
> > > > as well.
> > > >
> > > > However, _python uses the «*::…» form of an _arguments optspec,
> > > > which should take care of $words/$NUMERIC for you. I assume the
> reason
> > > > it didn't is that you used «compdef -p». Try -P instead? If I'm not
> > > > mistaken, that would also handle «python … script.py <TAB>» for you
> > > > (where the ellipsis stands for python's --options).
> > >
> > >
> > > I tested the 4 possible options, and found that switching -p with -P
> > > doesn't change anything, but shifting words and decrementing CURRENT
> > > works! But... I feel like it's a hack I'm not supposed to do
> > > (correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> Those parameters are documented, and manipulated by a number of
> functions (including _python, as it happens), so you _are_ using the API.
> See also the 'compset' builtin.
>
> However, as mentioned, I suspect that hardcoding a skip/decrement of one
> element won't DTRT if python is invoked with options (e.g., «python
> --foo script.py <TAB>») — not unless you reimplement _python's parsing
> of those options and any arguments to them.
>
> > > I now tried using the BUFFER variable instead of words (since it
> remains
> > > unchanged), but found that it also has caveats: The BUFFER variable
> > > contains the raw value of the line, whereas the words array contains
> the
> > > words after expansions (I think that's the right term).
>
> Partly. $words has undergone alias expansion, but not further
> expansions. In particular, the words are still quoted.
>
> > > To demonstrate this I tried running again completion for `python ps,py`
> > > with `#compdef -P *`, and printing out BUFFER and words. The debug
> log
> > > (and my terminal) showed the following:
> > > First of all _python was called and dispatched my script which printed
> > > `BUFFER=python ps.py` and `words=ps.py`.
>
> That's what I'd expect.
>
> > > After _python returned, my script was invoked again and printed
> > > `BUFFER=python ps.py` and `words=python*3* ps.py` (note the 3).
>
> I'm not sure offhand where this comes from. $context, $funcstack, et al
> may have clues.
>
> > > I do think the right solution is to be dispatched by _python with
> > > `#compdef -P *.py`, but to be able to run I need the words array as
> > > seen by _python
>
> Once an element is shifted off $words, it's lost forever (free() is
> called on it), so there'll be no way to access a "previous" value of $words
> unless a copy had been made somewhere.
>
> Moreover, consider that python may be itself wrapped by some precommand:
> for example, «env X=Y python», «sudo -u foo python», or «ssh foo python».
>
> You might try looking up the place that originally populates $words and
> making it stash a copy of $words in another, read-only array; then you'll
> be able to use «compset -P» and access that array. (Compare vcs_info's
> use of *_orig keys in ${hook_com}.)
>
> > > or a to understand how BUFFER can be expanded/converted to its
> correct
> > > form. If you have any input on this, I would very much appreciate
> > > it.
>
> Something along these lines, I think:
>
> local -a words2=( ${(z):-"$PREBUFFER${LBUFFER}x"} )
> words2[-1]=${words2[-1]%x}
> words2[1,${words2[(I)(;|&&|…)]}]=()
>
> To understand the second line, see addx() in Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c. With
> that out of the way, the first line's a textbook use of the ${(z)}
> tokenizer. The third line just throws out everything until the start of
> the current _simple command_ (see zshmisc(1)) — or, at least, it will
> once the ellipsis is filled out.
>
> Caveats: that snippet doesn't do alias expansion, doesn't try to deal
> with ${RBUFFER}, doesn't try to deal with SHORT_LOOPS, doesn't try to
> deal with precommands and precommand assignments, should be changed to
> use zZ+c+ if the INTERACTIVE_COMMENTS option is set…
>
> Although it's a plugin that I worked on myself, I should probably
> mention that zsh-syntax-highlighting has faced the same problem and you
> and implemented a solution to it, which handles a number of the above
> caveats.
>
> >
>
> There's also a third approach: instead of trying to run the binary, make
> it stash the output in a well-known location. For example, /usr/bin/foo
> could store the output in /usr/share/argcomplete/foo. (I've always
> wanted to standardize _some_ solution to this problem; I'm tired of
> writing completion functions by hand…)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>
--
Dan Arad
dan1994@xxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author