Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: A way to untie -T vars?
- X-seq: zsh-users 28753
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: Pier Paolo Grassi <pierpaolog@xxxxxxxxx>, Zsh Users <zsh-users@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: A way to untie -T vars?
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:27:16 -0800
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/users/28753>
- In-reply-to: <CAN=4vMpQRirh_m_-G3RQH7fxsMbs=Yh7biuXUbypzMmKG=Q3sg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-users.zsh.org>
- References: <CAKc7PVDEmKnY9TiYwaAgvzXEqNhLwZo46paUPjJOz9HsU3_djg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7YY5F_ZYJgivw9PSjt8PTQ9R+gHF3jnjbBw-LLkEnc2zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7bL4txwLp4zFPeDvb6fbYfJV6-mT+S4oFnrJ7cXPZr_Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7a1RHjYSGnY2=dgZn9n1ZgC2PyJQ12imiDU4gLW4q4saA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMpo9i5qr-HmH2ymaxaJ6hQLg-gThZkSRJvafUEp1oN0ag@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+y1xAJq6TrkbTOSFNs=jbf7_=sTYnj3Y1=qHoF5W4S1r=Zkg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMq56vaLYud4uX86c_fJOtuAHALGXvDqEb7fEB1-=Ec5ug@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7biHnWJV1=Cxd20xzikc9hk7037Rn4EwLenvyHsiQifmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMpQRirh_m_-G3RQH7fxsMbs=Yh7biuXUbypzMmKG=Q3sg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:47 AM Roman Perepelitsa
<roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Here foo is array-local-tag-tied-unique-hide-hideval. I believe it can
> be untied and become array-local-tag-unique-hide-hideval (only "tied"
> is gone).
Hm.
As best I can tell:
array local left justified 10 zero filled 10 uppercase tagged unique
tied FOO foo
(plus export, hide, and hideval, which typeset +m does not display) is
the largest possible set of type fields for a tied pair. If "left" is
replaced by "right" you can't have "zero filled", and "uppercase"
could be replaced only by "lowercase".
Of course the ${(t)FOO} words are not the same and don't include the size data.
scalar-local-left-right_zeros-lower-tag-tied-export-unique-hide-hideval
Also, although you can assign justification/filling to a tied pair,
none of it actually applies when expanding the array elements, so it's
questionable whether "untie" needs to preserve it for the array. I
suppose in Sebastian's use case, it should?
Another interesting note, "typeset -x" implies "-g" but "local -x" does not.
Pondering.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author