Re: path PATH

[Ray Andrews <rayandrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2023-01-30 08:09, Roman Perepelitsa wrote:
> We keep going in circles. If `typeset -p` doesn't do exactly what you
> want, it doesn't mean it's broken or bad. If it was *impossible* to
> produce the output you want, that would be actually bad. Up until now
> all output that you've identified as desirable was shown to be
> possible to produce without extending zsh. This means there is no need
> to extend zsh.

I've agreed to that several times.  My humble opinion is that typeset -p 
should produce a more complete output but that's just me.   Don't take 
this stuff more seriously than I take it.

Actually he just wants

  typeset -m bg

... yup.  Just when I reconcile myself to my ... = !hidden! ... then I see that hideval or not, one *can* see the value after all.  Ok, I surrender: typeset -p is a masterpiece of helpful, informative clarity.  And hidden values are still entirely visible just as one would expect from something hidden.  Got it.