Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is not POSIX compliant)

X-seq: zsh-users 29001
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is *not* POSIX compliant)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:31:31 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/users/29001>
In-reply-to: <CAMP44s0OgEcHuuGJn+_dB-1weLkUARxZPg-JCDztNGQi23fFiw@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-users.zsh.org>
References: <CAMP44s31HWYdR+Qn7w7yxzsboheEf_6xFv4yv6qGS8NBT_pqhA@mail.gmail.com> <D5349F8B-5D85-4E62-9FBC-520181FEC6A9@zsh.org> <CAMP44s2KB_DbemKs9jFu=0yy06DaC+H1W2SiueEoQ-rtHOp-NA@mail.gmail.com> <450942bd-dc7e-0d8b-7cf3-dbb52329ae99@eastlink.ca> <CAMP44s0OgEcHuuGJn+_dB-1weLkUARxZPg-JCDztNGQi23fFiw@mail.gmail.com>


On 2023-03-30 08:09, Felipe Contreras wrote:

Yeah, I agree zsh's behavior is much more useful, but I'm not talking
about zsh's behavior by default, but in sh mode.

Ah! Then I should be ranting ;-) It should be that way by default. If in doubt, do the useful thing.

References:
- Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is POSIX compliant)
  - From: Felipe Contreras
- Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is POSIX compliant)
  - From: Lawrence Velázquez
- Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is *not* POSIX compliant)
  - From: Felipe Contreras
- Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is *not* POSIX compliant)
  - From: Ray Andrews
- Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is *not* POSIX compliant)
  - From: Felipe Contreras

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Discrepancy in IFS handling (zsh is *not* POSIX compliant)