On 2026-05-11 11:10, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
$ echo foo{a-cx-z}bar
fooabar foobbar foocbar fooxbar fooybar foozbar
Interesting that that can be parsed so tersely. But I guess if the
presumption is that there's only single chars there, then 'cx' must be
'c' and 'x' so there's no confusion. As you describe it, that syntax is
both older and better, so what's the use of the '{a..c}' form? Must have
been invented for a reason.