Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Compctl fixes & a query
- X-seq: zsh-workers 232
- From: P.Stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: Compctl fixes & a query
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 95 11:27:40 +0100
- In-reply-to: "A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"'s message of "Mon, 17 Jul 95 18:17:51 BST." <27816.199507171717@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I think that, in the interests of consistency and name space
> preservation, it would be a good idea to use ~+n rather than ~n, as
> this reduces the number of characters that are treated specially. ~+n
> and ~-n can then be interpreted however pushd interprets +n and -n,
> depending on whether PUSHD_MINUS is set or not. What do people think
> of this?
I'm not keen on this either, it's just too long for a short cut.
Furthermore, on this keyboard ~ and + are at opposite ends of the
keyboard. I can do both with a left shift or right shift but it's a
little messy. I'm not very accurate with touch-typing the top row and
this maximises the difficulty.
It shouldn't be too cumbersome to check for a row of numbers followed
by either a slash or the end of the word. Presumably named
directories are going to have to take priority anyway in case there
are numeric user names (and on the basis that if you put it there, you
want it back again).
--
Peter Stephenson <P.Stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tel: +44 1792 205678 extn. 4461
WWW: http://python.swan.ac.uk/~pypeters/ Fax: +44 1792 295324
Department of Physics, University of Wales, Swansea,
Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, U.K.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author