Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: problem with zsh
- X-seq: zsh-workers 382
- From: Richard Coleman <coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: beg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (BERK GEVECI)
- Subject: Re: problem with zsh
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 15:10:07 -0400
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Sep 1995 14:53:34 EDT." <9509151853.AA77754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> i have downloaded and compiled the latest version of
> zsh (2.5.03) on several machines. it is running fine
> on four sgis ( with irix versions from 4 to 5 ).
> unfortunately, i had serious problems running it on
> a titan running 'TitanOS UNIX Release 4.2 P2 on 3000 Series'.
> it compiled fine with bunch of warnings ( as i was warned of ).
> the problem is that filename generation is acting very strangely.
> problems:
> 1) when i first run zsh ( starting from a csh ), it changes
> to the root directory.
> 2) when i try 'ls -d a*' in a directory which contains
> the following files:
> ammar run.1 run.2 temp
> i get these messages:
> amma: No such file or directory
> amtables: No such file or directory
> authority: No such file or directory
A couple of things.
1) The zsh mailing list is now broken into 3 mailing lists.
zsh-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You sent your message to the old zsh-list mailing list,
which gets forwarded to zsh-workers. You should probably
use zsh-workers in the future. Information about the various
mailing lists is contained in the META-FAQ available on any of
the zsh ftp sites.
2) I would appreciate if you would try to compile the latest beta
release (beta10 with beta11 due in the next week or so) on this
machine. If necessary, I can make you a snapshot of the latest
baseline source. Although 2.5.03 is the latest production release,
no more versions or upgrades for this particular version will be
released. The next production release will be 3.00, so we should
make sure the latest beta compiles on this machine.
3) You shouldn't worry too much about it being a beta release. Although
it has plenty of bugs, I think it is as least as stable as 2.5.03.
It is also considerably more portable.
Richard Coleman
coleman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author