Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: behaviour with rsh
- X-seq: zsh-workers 480
- From: Duncan Sinclair <sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: behaviour with rsh
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 17:12:30 +0100
- Cc: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Oct 1995 19:37:31 -0200."
Carlos Carvalho writes:
>
>Before zsh used to close file descriptors until 10. It was a hidden
>compile option. Why was it removed? I remember Duncan changed it a
>long time ago, but didn't suppress it, I think.
>
I can't remember my exact involvement in this, but the behaviour
of rsh and various shells is one area where I have too much
knowledge, and probably too strong opinions.
<PLUG>
Of course, the *complete* solution to this problem is to use
my "rxx" program, available from
ftp://ftp.dis.strath.ac.uk/pub/sinclair/rxx-4.2.2.tar.gz
</PLUG>
Now, my particular feeling was that although the "close fds 3-10"
solution fixes the problem, it is not an ideal solution in the
case when you happen to want to pass a file descriptor to zsh.
(This must have been my ammendment - the if test to see if it
is a "zsh -c" command.)
Ideally, what we want is a test to see if we are running under
rsh, and then do the close-fds. I remember promising such a
while ago, but never got round to it. I'll think more about it
this week.
More vague recollections on demand,
Duncan.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author